Las Vegas Taxi Accident Attorneys
Injured in a Las Vegas taxi accident?
A Las Vegas taxi crash is not a regular car accident, and it is not an Uber or Lyft accident either.
Jack’s Got Your Back
Las Vegas Taxi Accident Lawyers
Under Nevada law a taxicab is a certificated common carrier regulated by the Nevada Taxicab Authority, a different legal category from a rideshare, with different insurance, a different defendant, and a different duty of care. Treating a taxi claim like a rideshare claim is the single most common way these cases get undervalued. This page explains what actually applies, routed by whether you were a passenger, another driver or pedestrian, or a taxi driver hurt on the job.
If you were just hurt and you are still in Las Vegas, especially if you are flying home in a day or two, there are a few things worth doing now, before the evidence disappears. We cover those first, then explain the law that makes a taxi claim different.
What You Need to Know
- A taxi is a common carrier, not a rideshare, and that changes everything. A Las Vegas taxicab is a common motor carrier licensed by the Nevada Taxicab Authority under NRS Chapter 706. It is not a Transportation Network Company (TNC) like Uber or Lyft, which Nevada regulates separately under NRS Chapter 706A.
- A taxi carries continuous commercial coverage, with no “app off” gap. Built on NRS 706.305: the Taxicab Authority sets by regulation the liability insurance a cab must carry, and the statute caps what that regulation may require at $250,000 for one person’s injury or death, $500,000 per crash for two or more people, and $50,000 for property damage, or a $500,000 combined single limit. There is no rideshare-style coverage gap to fall into.
- The deepest pocket is usually the fleet’s policy. Because the cab operates under a certificate of public convenience and necessity held by a fleet company, the certificate holder’s commercial policy stands behind the crash, rather than an individual driver’s personal insurance.
- As a passenger, your claim runs under the common-carrier standard. The argument is that a cab company is held to more than the ordinary care a random motorist owes in how it operates the vehicle. We are not pointing you at one controlling Nevada decision on that standard, so ask your attorney how it would be framed in your case.
- The deadline is two years, and partial fault does not end your claim. Nevada gives you two years from the crash to file (NRS 11.190(4)(e)); your recovery is reduced by your share of fault and barred only if your fault is greater than the combined fault of the defendants you are suing (NRS 41.141). A visiting tourist’s Nevada crash is generally governed by Nevada law even after you fly home.
- Act fast on the evidence that vanishes: write down the cab number and medallion, keep your trip receipt, and identify the fleet company before that information is gone.
Find out what your case is worth
Free, confidential evaluation in as little as 5 minutes. Contact us today to speak to Jack personally.
- You pay nothing until we win
- Get an immediate call back. 24/7
- We do not sell or share your information
Over $500 Million in Verdicts & Settlements
Jack Bernstein stays personally involved in the cases his firm handles. We will investigate your claim and pursue any compensation that may be available under the facts and the law.
*Jack Bernstein has worked on the above cases during his career at this firm or another firm. Past results do not guarantee, warrant, or predict future cases.
See Case ResultsWhy hire Jack Bernstein Injury Lawyers?
Jack G. Bernstein, Esq. has been protecting the rights of injured victims and their families for over 40 years.
Speak to Jack about your caseI had such a great experience working with jack and his team I can’t express enough how grateful I am for them taking care of everything especially Shannon Chini she went above and beyond for me she definitely deserves the recognition I can’t recommend this law firm enough!
$500 million+ recovered
More than 40 years of verdicts and settlements for injured people and their families. Past results do not guarantee your outcome.
Jack is personally involved
You are not a case number. Jack stays involved in your case, and you will always know who is handling it.
We know how insurance companies work
Auto insurers want you to take a fast, low offer. We build every crash case as if it is going to trial.
Experts who strengthen your case
Accident reconstruction experts, doctors and investigators who show how the crash happened and what it has cost you.
No fee unless we win
No upfront cost. We advance the expenses of your case, and you pay no attorney fee unless we win.
Free consultation, day or night
Call any time, 24 hours a day. Tell us what happened and you will get an honest answer about your case.
What to do first if you were just hurt in a Las Vegas taxi
If you are leaving town soon, the evidence that proves a taxi claim is the evidence that vanishes fastest. A few minutes now protects the claim later.
Record the cab number and medallion
Keep the trip receipt and payment record
Photograph the scene, the vehicles, and your injuries
Get the other parties’ information
Ask about in-cab camera and dispatch records
Report it to the Nevada taxicab authority
Get medical care and keep every record
If you would like to talk through your specific situation, call Jack Bernstein Injury Lawyers at (702) 633-3333 for a free consultation.
Is suing a Las Vegas taxi different from suing Uber or Lyft?
Yes, and the difference is the whole point. A taxicab and a rideshare are two different legal animals in Nevada, governed by two different chapters of the law, and conflating them is how a taxi case gets pointed at the wrong coverage and the wrong defendant.
A Las Vegas taxicab is a common motor carrier regulated under NRS Chapter 706 by the Nevada Taxicab Authority. To operate, a taxi company must hold a certificate of public convenience and necessity from the Authority (NRS 706.8827), and each vehicle carries a medallion. Operating a cab in passenger service without that certificate is a crime under NRS 706.885. This is the traditional, tightly regulated common-carrier model.
A rideshare, Uber, Lyft, is a Transportation Network Company (TNC) regulated under a separate statute, NRS Chapter 706A, enacted in 2015. A TNC does not hold a certificate of public convenience and necessity. Uber and Lyft treat their drivers as independent contractors. Nevada’s TNC statute does not address employment status; what it does say is that, except as the chapter, its regulations or a written contract with the driver provide, a company shall not control, direct or manage a driver or the driver’s vehicle (NRS 706A.090). Critically, its insurance is app-period tiered: coverage rises and falls depending on whether the app is off, on and waiting, or actively carrying a passenger. The full mechanics of that tiered coverage belong to the rideshare framework; we explain them in depth on our Las Vegas Uber and Lyft accident page. What matters here is the contrast.
| Las Vegas Taxicab | Rideshare / TNC (Uber, Lyft) | |
|---|---|---|
| Governing law | NRS Chapter 706 (Motor Carriers) | NRS Chapter 706A (Transportation Network Companies) |
| Regulator | Nevada Taxicab Authority | Nevada Transportation Authority |
| License to operate | Certificate of public convenience and necessity + medallion (NRS 706.8827) | TNC permit; no certificate of public convenience required |
| Driver status | Operates under the fleet’s certificate | Treated by the company as an independent contractor; NRS 706A.090 limits the company’s control over the driver and the vehicle |
| Insurance structure | Continuous commercial coverage while in service (NRS 706.305 structure) | App-period tiered, coverage depends on whether the app is off / waiting / on a trip |
| Coverage while the app is on and waiting | Continuous commercial coverage, with no app-period tiers | Lower limits while the driver is logged in and waiting: $50,000 per person, $100,000 per crash and $25,000 property damage (NRS 690B.470) |
The practical takeaway: when a taxi crashes with a fare aboard, the commercial coverage is already on and the responsible company is already identified by its certificate. There is no need to parse which “app period” was live or to chase an individual driver’s personal auto policy. For an injured passenger, that usually means a more certain source of recovery, though not necessarily a larger one: while a rideshare driver is providing transportation services, Nevada requires transportation network company insurance of at least $1,000,000 (NRS 690B.470). The certainty is why it matters that no one treats the claim as if it were a rideshare case.
How much insurance does a Las Vegas taxi carry?
A Las Vegas taxicab carries commercial liability coverage set by the Nevada Taxicab Authority under NRS 706.305, the statute that governs taxicab insurance. NRS 706.305 directs the Authority to adopt regulations requiring every taxicab under its supervision to maintain liability insurance, and it caps what those regulations may require at:
- $250,000 for bodily injury to or the death of one person in any one crash;
- $500,000 for bodily injury to or death of two or more persons in any one crash; and
- $50,000 for injury to or destruction of property in any one crash;
- or a $500,000 combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage in any one crash.
A fleet may also satisfy this obligation through self-insurance, a bond, or a deposited security instead of a conventional policy (NRS 706.3052 to 706.3058), large operators often do. Either way, the financial responsibility is continuous and commercial: it does not switch on and off with an app.
Two points the median taxi page leaves out matter here. First, these figures are the ceiling on what the Taxicab Authority may require by regulation, not an amount every cab is guaranteed to carry, and the amounts actually required are set in the Authority’s own regulations. Your actual damages can exceed the policy, and Nevada allows you to pursue compensation beyond the policy limits, including punitive damages under NRS 42.005 where clear and convincing evidence shows the driver acted with oppression, fraud or malice, although that section limits the award to three times your compensatory damages, or $300,000 where those are under $100,000. Those limits fall away under NRS 42.010 where the driver caused the crash by driving in violation of Nevada’s impaired driving laws after willfully consuming alcohol or another substance, which turns on how the crash happened rather than on whether the driver was ever convicted. Second, the certificate holder, the fleet company that holds the operating certificate, stands behind that coverage, so the policy answering your claim is a fleet’s commercial policy rather than an individual driver’s personal insurance.
Who pays for a Las Vegas taxi accident? The defendant stack
Identifying who is responsible is where a taxi claim is built, and it is structurally different from a rideshare claim. Liability in a Las Vegas taxi crash routes through the fleet / certificate holder, not just the individual driver.
Clark County taxis operate under a small set of certificate holders, fleets such as Yellow Checker Star, Frias, Desert Cab, and Nellis Cab run hundreds of vehicles under their certificates. When one of their cabs is involved in a crash, the fleet operator’s commercial policy and its duty as a common carrier are in play. The case is built by identifying the certificate holder behind the cab number and medallion, not by figuring out which app period was active.
| Potential defendant | Source of liability | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| The taxi fleet / certificate holder | Commercial liability coverage; common-carrier duty; responsibility for vehicle maintenance and driver supervision | Usually the deepest and most certain pocket; identified by the cab’s certificate and medallion |
| The taxi driver | Direct negligence in operating the cab | Operates under the fleet’s certificate; rarely the only or primary source of recovery |
| Another at-fault motorist | Direct negligence | If a third driver caused or contributed to the crash, their coverage is added to the stack |
| A vehicle or parts manufacturer | Product defect (brakes, tires, etc.) | Less common, but relevant where a mechanical failure contributed |
Because Nevada certificate holders must keep their vehicles to maintenance and inspection standards and must supervise their permitted drivers, a crash can open more than one theory against the fleet, not only that the driver was negligent, but that the company failed in a duty it could not delegate away. An adjuster who frames the case as “just the driver” is narrowing the recovery; the certificate holder is the structural center of a taxi claim.
What duty does a taxi owe its passengers? Common-Carrier care
A Nevada taxicab is a common carrier, and an injured passenger argues that a common carrier is held to more than ordinary care in the operation of the vehicle. There is no single controlling Nevada decision we point you to on that standard, and how far it reaches beyond the driving itself is argued case by case.
One precise point: a crash arises from the operation of the vehicle itself, which is the setting where the common-carrier argument is at its strongest. (Carriers argue that risks unrelated to transportation are governed by ordinary reasonable care, and how far any stricter standard reaches is argued case by case.) A collision is the core vehicle-operation claim, so it is the strongest footing an injured taxi passenger has for that argument. This is a lever the median taxi page never names: an injured passenger argues that the cab company is not measured against the same baseline as the random motorist next to it, because of what it holds itself out to do. For more on how the common-carrier standard works across Nevada transit, our overview of passenger rights and the common-carrier standard in limo and party-bus cases explains the duty in depth.
A note on authority: we are not pointing you at one controlling Nevada decision here, because the standard itself, and how far it reaches, is argued case by case rather than settled by a single opinion. Ask your attorney how it applies to your crash. Getting the standard right is part of valuing the claim correctly.
Routing the claim: passenger, other driver, or taxi driver
A “taxi accident” is really three different cases depending on where you were sitting. Each routes differently.
If you were a passenger in the taxi
This is the most direct path. As a fare in the cab, your claim is argued under the common-carrier standard for the operation of the vehicle, and the fleet’s continuous commercial coverage is already in force. Your claim runs primarily against the certificate holder (and the driver), and, if another motorist caused or shared in the crash, against that driver too. You do not need to have done anything; you were a passenger. Preserve the cab number, medallion, and receipt, get treatment, and identify the carrier.
Many taxi passengers in Las Vegas are visiting tourists (airport runs, Strip-to-Strip, casino trips) who may be home in another state within days. That does not weaken the claim. A Nevada crash is generally governed by Nevada law under the most-significant-relationship test Nevada follows for choice of law (General Motors Corp. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Ct., 122 Nev. 466, 134 P.3d 111 (2006)): the law of the place where the injury occurred presumptively applies, unless another state has a more significant relationship to the parties and events. In plain terms, you generally do not get to substitute your home state’s law for Nevada’s just because you flew home, and you do not need to stay in Las Vegas to pursue the claim. The out-of-state logistics of handling a Nevada claim from home are covered on our Las Vegas tourist injury page.
If you were another driver, pedestrian, or cyclist hit by a taxi
If a cab hit you, the common-carrier argument is not yours to make; it is made on behalf of the cab’s passengers. But you are owed ordinary reasonable care, and the same structural advantage applies: the at-fault cab is backed by a fleet’s commercial coverage and certificate holder, generally a more substantial source of recovery than a private driver. Your claim is an ordinary negligence claim against the driver and the certificate holder, built on the same identification step, get the cab number, medallion, and company.
If you are a taxi driver hurt on the job
A cab driver injured in a crash on shift usually has two tracks running at once:
- A workers’ compensation claim against the fleet/employer. Under Nevada’s exclusive-remedy rule (NRS 616A.020), workers’ compensation is generally your sole remedy against your employer, it pays medical and a portion of lost wages regardless of fault, but it does not pay for pain and suffering.
- A third-party claim against the at-fault motorist who caused the crash. The exclusive-remedy rule bars suing your employer, and it bars suing a co-worker or another driver in the same employ, but it does not bar a separate negligence claim against a motorist outside your employer, and that claim can recover the full range of damages workers’ comp does not, including pain and suffering.
These two tracks interact. If you recover from the at-fault driver, the workers’ compensation insurer typically has a subrogation lien to be repaid out of that recovery, but Nevada now caps that lien (SB 258, 2025, at NRS 616C.215(7)) at the lesser of the full lien or roughly one-third of your total recovery, which preserves more of the third-party money for you. Coordinating the comp claim and the third-party claim so the lien does not swallow the recovery is the core of an injured-driver case.
The wrong-regime trap: how taxi claims get undervalued
The most damaging mistake in a Las Vegas taxi case is treating it like a rideshare case, or like an ordinary fender-bender. It happens in predictable ways, and each one costs money:
Chasing the wrong coverage
Suing the wrong defendant
Accepting the wrong duty
Comparative-fault inflation
The two-year clock
Consider a hypothetical. A visitor takes a taxi from Harry Reid airport to the Strip, the cab is rear-ended at a light, and she is injured. An adjuster offers a quick settlement framed around the driver’s coverage and suggests she “deal with it back home.” In reality, the fleet’s commercial policy is already in force, her claim against the certificate holder is argued under the common-carrier standard, and Nevada law governs the claim regardless of where she lives; the quick offer is built on the wrong regime. This is a hypothetical example for illustrative purposes only. Actual case outcomes depend on specific facts, evidence, and circumstances.
If you were injured in Las Vegas
A taxi crash in an unfamiliar city, on a tight timeline, with a regulatory structure most people have never heard of, is exactly the kind of case where the wrong framing costs the most. With over 40 years as a personal injury attorney and more than $500 million recovered in verdicts and settlements, Jack Bernstein understands how Nevada’s common-carrier and Taxicab Authority rules shape a taxi claim, how to identify the certificate holder behind the cab, reach the fleet’s commercial coverage, press the common-carrier standard, and keep a tourist’s claim alive under Nevada law after you have flown home. If you or a family member was hurt in or by a Las Vegas taxi, as a passenger, another driver, or a cab driver on the job, Jack Bernstein Injury Lawyers offers a free consultation to evaluate your options, the evidence that needs to be preserved now, and the path forward. Because a Nevada injury claim must generally be filed within two years, and only limited exceptions change that deadline, it is worth starting early.
Whether you are still in Las Vegas or already home
You do not need to know who holds the cab’s certificate or which insurer covers the fleet before you call. Tell us what happened and Jack will tell you honestly whether it is a case worth bringing, even after you have flown home.
Free consultation · No fee unless we win · Available 24/7
Related reading
We will contact you immediately.
The consultation is free, confidential, and available now. Tell us what happened. We will tell you where you stand.
Call Now 24/7/365(702) 633-3333Find out what your case is worth
Free, confidential evaluation in as little as 5 minutes. Contact us today to speak to Jack personally.
- You pay nothing until we win
- Get an immediate call back. 24/7
- We do not sell or share your information