Jack G. Bernstein, Las Vegas wrongful death trial lawyer
$500M+
Recovered
Jack G. Bernstein, Esq.
Personal Injury Lawyer

Las Vegas Wrongful Death Attorneys

Lost a loved one in Las Vegas?

If someone you love died in Las Vegas because of another person’s carelessness, you are likely being pulled in three directions at once: the coroner’s office, an insurance adjuster, and the question of who in your family is even allowed to act.

No fee unless we win
Available 24 hours a day
National Top 100 Trial Lawyer
Lost a loved one?

Jack’s Got Your Back

Las Vegas Wrongful Death Lawyers

This page is built to give you your bearings: what a Nevada wrongful death case actually is, whether you are the right person to bring it, and the few things that have to happen quickly so that nothing irreversible closes a door you didn’t know was open.

$500M+
Recovered for Clients
50,000+
Cases Handled
40+
Years of Experience
National Trial Lawyers Top 100
Jack G. Bernstein Esq. Las Vegas Personal Injury Lawyer NV Bar#9971
Best of the Bar award
Jack Bernstein, Injury Lawyers, PLLC A+ BBB Accreditation & Rating
Avvo rated attorney
Google 5-star reviews

Find out what your case is worth

Free, confidential evaluation in as little as 5 minutes. Contact us today to speak to Jack personally.

  • You pay nothing until we win
  • Get an immediate call back. 24/7
  • We do not sell or share your information
Available 24/7. Or call (702) 633-3333

Start where you are

What You Need to Know

A Nevada wrongful death case is not a single lawsuit. It can be up to three parallel claims. Under NRS 41.085, the statutory heirs hold one claim (their own grief or sorrow, loss of probable support, companionship, society, comfort and consortium, plus the decedent’s pain, suffering or disfigurement) and the estate holds a second (pre-death special damages such as medical bills, funeral expenses, and penalties including punitive damages, but not the decedent’s pain, suffering or disfigurement). A survival action under NRS 41.100 keeps a claim the person already had from being lost at their death, though subsection 3 of that section does not apply to the estate’s wrongful death cause of action. Pursuing only one can leave the categories the others cover on the table.

Who is an “heir” is defined by Nevada inheritance law, not by who is handling the funeral. An heir is the person who would inherit the decedent’s separate property if there were no will. That is commonly a spouse or registered domestic partner together with the children, and the parents where there is neither. The person organizing arrangements is often not the same person with standing to recover.

An action for the death of a person caused by the wrongful act or neglect of another must generally be commenced within two years (NRS 11.190(4)(e)). Different deadlines and exceptions can apply: an action for injury or death against a provider of health care runs under NRS 41A.097, which for an injury or death occurring on or after October 1, 2023 allows no more than three years after the date of injury or two years after the plaintiff discovers, or through the use of reasonable diligence should have discovered, the injury, whichever comes first, and the period does not run while a person entitled to bring the action was under 18 or insane when the claim accrued (NRS 11.250).

The first 30 to 60 days decide more than most families realize. A coroner’s “natural causes” finding does not settle civil liability; the at-fault party’s primary insurance is often the smallest layer of available coverage; and a quick “release” from an adjuster can quietly wipe out the survival action before anyone has counted the cost.

You do not have to know which claim is which to protect your family’s rights, but you do have to act before the deadline runs or a signature forecloses a claim. A consultation costs nothing.

The record

Over $500 Million in Verdicts & Settlements

Jack Bernstein stays personally involved in the cases his firm handles. We will investigate your claim and pursue any compensation that may be available under the facts and the law.

$7,900,000Car accident resulting in wrongful death
$2,225,000Premises liability resulting in death
$9,000,000Auto accident injury resulting in neck injury
$3,000,000Truck accident injury resulting in neck injuries
$2,550,000Head-on motor vehicle collision with neck and back injuries
$2,250,000Medical malpractice injury resulting in paralysis

*Jack Bernstein has worked on the above cases during his career at this firm or another firm. Past results do not guarantee, warrant, or predict future cases.

See Case Results
Protecting your rights for over 40 years

Why hire Jack Bernstein Injury Lawyers?

Jack G. Bernstein, Esq. has been protecting the rights of injured victims and their families for over 40 years.

Speak to Jack about your case
What our clients say

Justice pays but only when you have a legal team that truly represents your interest. This is exactly what I got from Jack Bernstein and his legal team. The staff are very professional and compassionate. I will definitely recommend them to anyone at their time of need.

Betty Lopez
  • $500 million+ recovered

    More than 40 years of verdicts and settlements for injured people and their families. Past results do not guarantee your outcome.

  • Jack is personally involved

    You are not a case number. Jack stays involved in your case, and you will always know who is handling it.

  • We know how insurance companies work

    These claims often involve more than one responsible party and more than one policy. We find every one for your family.

  • Experts who strengthen your case

    Accident, medical and financial experts who show what happened and what the loss means for your family’s future.

  • No fee unless we win

    No upfront cost. We advance the expenses of your case, and you pay no attorney fee unless we win.

  • Free consultation, day or night

    Call any time, 24 hours a day. Tell us what happened and you will get an honest answer about your case.

The first days: what to protect right now

If the death is recent, the most useful thing this page can do is tell you the small number of things that are time-sensitive, so you can set the rest aside while you grieve.

The reason early action matters is structural, not dramatic: evidence in these cases degrades on its own schedule, and some of the most important proof is controlled by people who are not on your side. Surveillance video is overwritten on a cycle. Vehicles get repaired or scrapped. An autopsy, if one is needed to establish what actually caused the death, is most useful when it happens within roughly the first day or two. None of these wait for a family to finish making arrangements.

A short, practical list of what to protect early:

  • Preserve, don’t repair or release: Keep the vehicle, the equipment, the clothing, or the scene as undisturbed as possible, and do not authorize repairs or disposal of anything connected to the death until someone has evaluated it.
  • Write down what you saw and were told: Names of witnesses, what staff or officials said at the scene, the timeline as you experienced it. Memory fades and staff turn over.
  • Be careful with the early phone call: An adjuster who calls “to check on you” in the first days is gathering a recorded statement, not offering condolences. You are not required to give one, and you are not required to sign anything.
  • Ask about an independent autopsy before it’s too late if the cause of death is in any doubt. A privately retained forensic pathologist can preserve evidence the official process may not, and timing matters. This is the subject of a dedicated guide on the independent autopsy.

What this means for you: You do not have to understand the law in the first week. You do have to keep things from being thrown away, repaired, or signed. Those are the moves that cannot be undone later.

If a family member died and an insurance company or the coroner has already made contact, talking through your specific situation early, before evidence is gone or a document is signed, is the single highest-value step you can take. A consultation is free.

Who can bring a wrongful death claim in Nevada

The first question many families ask is not “do we have a case” but “am I even the right person to do something about it.” Nevada answers that question by statute, and the answer is more specific than most people expect.

Nevada law gives standing to two categories of people: the decedent’s heirs and the decedent’s personal representative (the person who administers the estate). Under NRS 41.085, “the heirs of the decedent and the personal representatives of the decedent may each maintain an action for damages against the person who caused the death.” They are not the same role, and they recover different things.

Here is the part that surprises families: an “heir” is not defined by who was closest to the person, who is paying for the funeral, or who is named in a will. The statute defines an heir as a person who “would be entitled to succeed to the separate property of the decedent if the decedent had died intestate.” In plain terms, those are the people Nevada’s inheritance rules would recognize if there were no will at all. In practice that usually means:

  • A surviving spouse or registered domestic partner
  • The decedent’s children, who are commonly heirs at the same time as a surviving spouse rather than behind one
  • The decedent’s parents, where there is no spouse or children
  • Other relatives, where there is no closer heir. Which relatives qualify, and alongside whom, follows Nevada’s intestate-succession rules as they apply to the particular family, so it is worth having an attorney confirm it instead of assuming a ranking

Because standing flows from inheritance status, the category can be both narrower and broader than families assume. It can exclude a devoted partner who was never married or registered. Where the person who died was a child, the parents are commonly the heirs where the child left no spouse and no issue, and the claim is valued differently: what the heirs recover includes the loss of the child’s probable support, which is not a wage history to add up. Whether a particular relationship qualifies turns on how Nevada’s inheritance rules treat it, which is a question worth putting to an attorney rather than answering from the family tree. And it means the person organizing the memorial is frequently not the person with the strongest claim.

What this means for you: Before anyone assumes they can’t act, or that someone else “has it handled,” it’s worth confirming who the statute actually recognizes. The person who feels responsible and the person with legal standing are often two different people, and getting that wrong wastes time you may not have. Situations involving unmarried partners, out-of-state or international families, or disputes among relatives have their own paths, covered in the guide for unmarried partners and the guides for out-of-state executors and international families.

One more thing worth knowing early, because it changes how a family should coordinate: Nevada treats the heirs’ claims as their own, individual claims. The statute says the heirs and the personal representatives “may each maintain an action for damages,” and the Nevada Supreme Court has read that as “two separate wrongful death claims, one belonging to the heirs of the decedent and the other belonging to the personal representative of the decedent, with neither being able to pursue the other’s separate claim” (Alcantara v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 130 Nev. 252 (2014)). In El Jen Medical Hospital, Inc. v. Tyler (Nev. 2023) (No. 83945, decided September 21, 2023) the court held that an arbitration agreement the decedent signed did not bind the heirs’ wrongful death claims, declining to treat “the heirs’ claim as derivative” of the decedent’s. How other contracts the person signed before death affect an heir’s claim was not decided there. That separateness is the thread that runs through the rest of this page.

Nevada wrongful death is not one claim, it’s up to three

This is the single most important idea on this page, and it is the one the typical “wrongful death” overview skips. In Nevada, a death caused by negligence can generate three distinct claims, each with a different owner and a different set of recoverable damages. Treating it as one lawsuit is how money that belongs to a family gets left behind.

The three claims are:

The claimWho owns itWhat it recoversAuthority
The heirs’ wrongful death claimEach statutory heir, individuallyThe heirs’ own losses: grief or sorrow, loss of probable support, loss of companionship, society, comfort and consortium, and the decedent’s pain, suffering, or disfigurementNRS 41.085(4)
The estate’s wrongful death claimThe personal representative, for the estateSpecial damages such as pre-death medical bills and funeral expenses, plus any punitive (exemplary) damages the decedent could have recoveredNRS 41.085(5)
The survival actionThe estate, stepping into the decedent’s shoesThe decedent’s own cause of action is not lost by their death and may be maintained by the executor or administrator (subsection 1), so the losses the decedent sustained before death travel with it. It is not a second route to the decedent’s pain and suffering in a death case: subsection 3, which adds pain, suffering or disfigurement and loss of probable support and companionship, does not apply to the cause of action of a decedent brought by the personal representatives for the decedent’s wrongful death, so in a death case those losses come through NRS 41.085 insteadNRS 41.100

A few distinctions inside that table do real work:

Heirs and the estate recover different things, and the line is exact. The statute gives heirs their grief, lost support, and companionship under subsection (4). It gives the estate the special damages and any punitive damages under subsection (5). But subsection (5) expressly says the estate’s recovery does “not include damages for pain, suffering or disfigurement of the decedent.” Under subsection (4), that pain-and-suffering-of-the-decedent piece is recoverable by the heirs, alongside their own grief, lost support, and companionship. The survival statute is not a second route to it: NRS 41.100(3) says in terms that it “does not apply to the cause of action of a decedent brought by the decedent’s personal representatives for the decedent’s wrongful death,” and the Nevada Supreme Court applied exactly that in Alsenz v. Clark County School District, 109 Nev. 1062 (1993), adding that letting the estate recover the same items “would result in double recovery.” Punitive damages, by contrast, run only to the estate’s claim, not to the heirs.

There’s a creditor consequence built into the statute. Money awarded to heirs under subsection (4) is, by the statute’s own terms, “not liable for any debt of the decedent.” Money recovered by the estate is. That single difference can decide how much a family actually keeps after a death’s bills are paid. That is why how a recovery is structured across the heirs’ and the estate’s claims is not a technicality.

Where the survival statute does its work. It is not a remedy for the death; it keeps the decedent’s own claim alive. NRS 41.100 provides that “no cause of action is lost by reason of the death of any person, but may be maintained by or against the person’s executor or administrator.” Its subsection 3, which lists the decedent’s own pre-death losses including pain, suffering or disfigurement, ends with a carve-out: it “does not apply to the cause of action of a decedent brought by the decedent’s personal representatives for the decedent’s wrongful death.” So where the injury is what caused the death, the decedent’s pain and suffering is what the heirs recover under NRS 41.085(4), not a separate estate recovery through the survival statute (Alsenz). The deeper comparison, including how that suffering is proven, lives in the guides on survival actions versus wrongful death and proving conscious pain and suffering.

Nevada law lets these be brought together. The heirs’ action and the decedent’s surviving claim “which arose out of the same wrongful act or neglect may be joined” (NRS 41.085(3)). The point of coordinating them is not procedure for its own sake; it is making sure no category quietly goes unclaimed.

What this means for you: If a family settles “the wrongful death case” without accounting for each claim separately, it can sign away the heirs’ recovery of the decedent’s pain and suffering, the estate’s punitive exposure, or the creditor protection that comes with the heirs’ share. Knowing which claim carries what is what lets you ask whether all of it is being pursued.

Where the money actually comes from

Most families look at the at-fault party’s insurance policy, see a number, and assume that number is the ceiling. In serious cases it is frequently the floor.

The recovery in a wrongful death case is usually assembled from a stack of coverage layers, and the at-fault party’s primary policy is often the smallest one. Depending on the facts, the layers that can apply include an umbrella policy over the at-fault individual; a commercial or fleet policy if a business vehicle or employee was involved; the coverage of additional responsible parties most families never identify on their own; and, frequently overlooked, the decedent’s own underinsured motorist (UM/UIM) coverage, which in Nevada pays the damages that exceed the at-fault driver’s bodily-injury limits, up to the limits of the decedent’s own coverage (NRS 687B.145(2)). Identifying every layer is much of the work in a high-value case, and it is exactly the work an early, low offer is designed to short-circuit.

This page deliberately does not put a dollar figure on a Nevada wrongful death case, because an honest number depends entirely on the facts: the coverage available, the decedent’s earnings and dependents, and the strength of the liability proof. What the recovery is built from, and how to think about its value, are covered in the dedicated guides on how much a wrongful death case is worth and the wrongful death settlement calculator. The split between the heirs’ and the estate’s recovery, including how funeral and probate costs are handled, is covered in the guide to recovering funeral and probate costs.

What this means for you: When an adjuster points to the primary policy limit as if it were the whole story, that is a starting position, not a fact about your case. The question worth asking is not “what is the policy” but “what are all the policies, and who else is responsible.”

The coroner said natural causes. Is the case over?

For many families, the moment that feels like the end is a death certificate or coroner’s report that reads “natural causes,” “pre-existing condition,” or “undetermined.” If that conclusion does not match what your family witnessed, the case is not necessarily over.

The reason is a distinction the official paperwork does not explain: a coroner or medical examiner answers a medical question (what, biologically, caused this person to die), while a civil claim turns on a legal question (did someone’s negligence play a substantial role in the death). Those are not the same test, and a finding on the first does not decide the second.

Two well-established Nevada doctrines are why:

Causation when more than one thing contributed

A defendant’s negligence does not have to be the only cause of a death to support liability. What has to be shown is that the death was caused by the wrongful act or neglect (NRS 41.085), and the precise causation standard the jury is given depends on the case. A person can die of a heart attack, and a negligent party can still be legally responsible if the evidence shows their conduct contributed to bringing it about.

The eggshell plaintiff doctrine

A defendant takes the victim as they find them. A pre-existing condition that made someone more vulnerable does not excuse the negligence that pushed them over the edge; it does not reduce the wrongdoer’s responsibility.

This is also where the timing in the first days pays off. Where the cause of death is genuinely disputed, a privately retained forensic pathologist can examine the evidence and document findings the official process may not pursue, and that examination is most effective early. The full mechanics, and when it’s worth doing, are in the guide to the independent autopsy in disputed cases.

What this means for you: A “natural causes” or “undetermined” finding is evidence, not a verdict on liability. If the medical conclusion doesn’t fit what your family saw, that gap is a reason to have someone evaluate the case, not a reason to walk away from it.

What the insurance company is doing in the first weeks

Plaintiff-side practice in these cases is, in large part, the practice of recognizing what the other side does early, because the other side is working from the moment a death is reported, and the family usually is not.

A few patterns are worth naming plainly, because they are how recovery gets reduced or lost before a case ever begins:

The quick “release.”

An early settlement offer often comes attached to a release written broadly enough to extinguish more than the heirs’ claim. Because the survival action is a separate claim (NRS 41.100), a broad release signed in the first weeks (before anyone has valued the survival claim, identified every coverage layer, or measured the future losses) can sign away claims the family did not know they had. There is no undo on a signed release.

The recorded statement

A friendly call in the first days, asking how you’re holding up and what happened, is an evidence-gathering event. Answers given while grieving and uninformed are used later to build a comparative-fault narrative.

Comparative-fault inflation

Nevada is a modified comparative negligence state. Recovery is reduced by the decedent’s share of fault and is barred only when that share is greater than the combined negligence of the parties the family is seeking recovery from (NRS 41.141). This is the threshold commonly described as the 51% bar, though the statute itself prints no percentage. That is precisely why an adjuster has an incentive to build a story that inflates the decedent’s fault before the family has retained anyone to reconstruct what really happened. (How comparative fault works in detail is covered in the guide to Nevada’s modified comparative negligence law.)

What this means for you: The most damaging mistakes in a wrongful death case are usually made in the weeks before a lawyer is involved: a recorded statement given, a release signed, a vehicle scrapped. You don’t need to outmaneuver an insurance company. You need to not hand it anything irreversible while you decide what to do.

How long you have to act

Of everything on this page, the deadline is the one to confirm first, because more than one period can apply and missing the one that applies to your family can end the claim.

The general rule: a Nevada wrongful death claim must generally be commenced within two years after the cause of action accrues. The governing statute, NRS 11.190(4)(e), sets a two-year limit for “an action to recover damages for injuries to a person or for the death of a person caused by the wrongful act or neglect of another.”

Two important wrinkles:

There are narrow exceptions, and they are narrow

The exceptions come from the statutes themselves, and each one is specific: the two-year period does not run while a person entitled to sue was under 18 or insane when the cause of action accrued (NRS 11.250), and some claims, including claims against health care providers, are governed by their own limitation statute. No family should assume an exception applies to them without having it checked. The boundaries are covered in the guide to how statutes of limitations affect wrongful death lawsuits.

Deaths involving medical care follow a different clock

When the death arises from the care of a health care provider, a separate limitations rule applies under NRS 41A.097, with its own outer limit and its own discovery analysis. For a death occurring on or after October 1, 2023, the action generally may not be commenced more than three years after the date of injury or two years after the plaintiff discovers, or through reasonable diligence should have discovered, the injury, whichever occurs first; for a death between October 1, 2002 and September 30, 2023 the discovery period was one year. A professional negligence complaint also has to include the medical expert affidavit required by NRS 41A.071 or the district court must dismiss it without prejudice, which is a reason to get the timing checked, not assumed. (Whether a doctor can be sued for a patient’s death is addressed in the guide on suing a doctor for wrongful death.)

What this means for you: Treat the two-year period as the one to plan around, but have the deadline confirmed for your specific facts immediately, because it is not the only one that can apply: an action for injury or death against a provider of health care runs under NRS 41A.097, which for an injury or death occurring on or after October 1, 2023 allows no more than three years after the date of injury or two years after the plaintiff discovers, or through the use of reasonable diligence should have discovered, the injury, whichever comes first. Other deadlines and exceptions can also apply, including that the period does not run while a person entitled to bring the action was under 18 or insane when the claim accrued (NRS 11.250). Do not assume an exception applies to you: of everything on this page, the date is the one thing worth confirming today.

When you are ready to talk

More than one period can apply, and you should not have to sort out which one is yours while grieving. Tell us what happened, when you are ready, and Jack will confirm the date that matters. No pressure, no obligation, no cost.

Free consultation · No fee unless we win · Available 24/7

How to choose a wrongful death firm: what to ask

Once a family understands the shape of the case, the next decision is who to trust with it. Wrongful death is a high-stakes, document-heavy area, and not every firm is built for it. A useful way to evaluate any firm (not just this one) is to ask questions that track the substance above:

“How will you make sure all three claims are pursued (the heirs’ claim, the estate’s claim, and the survival action)?”

A firm that talks only about “the wrongful death case” as a single thing may leave categories unclaimed.

“How do you identify every layer of available coverage?”

The answer should go well beyond the at-fault party’s primary policy.

“What needs to be preserved right now, and who is doing it?”

Evidence and autopsy timing are urgent; the answer should be specific.

“If the coroner’s finding is disputed, how do you establish causation?”

You want to hear substantial factor, eggshell plaintiff, and independent forensic review, not a shrug.

“How is the case staffed, and who will actually handle it?”

It is fair to ask whether a named attorney will be involved in your case or whether it will be passed to a rotating cast.

Each of those questions traces to something concrete on this page, which is the point: a firm worth hiring should be able to answer them in terms of your situation. A free consultation is the place to ask all of them.

If you were injured in Las Vegas

Some deaths that lead to a wrongful death case have a more specific legal home, and that home is where the deepest help lives. If the death involved a commercial truck or fleet vehicle, the federal regulatory layer and multi-defendant insurance structure are handled on the Las Vegas truck accident page. If the death followed a catastrophic injury before it became fatal, the Las Vegas catastrophic injury page addresses the long-horizon damages those cases carry. Specific causes have their own guides as well. For example, whether you can sue for wrongful death after a car accident.

For families in the wider service area, the same Nevada law applies whether the death occurred in Las Vegas proper, Henderson, Summerlin, Boulder City, or Pahrump. Wrongful death sits within the firm’s broader Las Vegas personal injury practice.

Talk to Jack Bernstein Injury Lawyers

Losing a family member to someone else’s negligence forces decisions no one is ready to make, on a clock no one asked for. With over 40 years as a personal injury attorney and more than $500 million recovered in verdicts and settlements, Jack Bernstein understands how a Nevada wrongful death case actually works: the three separate claims, the coverage layers most families never find, and the early moves that protect a recovery before a deadline or a signature closes it off. Jack is personally involved in every case. If a family member has died in circumstances you believe were caused by another’s negligence, Jack Bernstein Injury Lawyers offers a free consultation to evaluate who has standing, which claims apply, and the time-sensitive steps that remain, with No Fees Unless We Win. Because a Nevada wrongful death action must generally be commenced within two years after the cause of action accrues, and other deadlines and exceptions can apply, it is worth confirming your timeline now rather than later. Call (702) 633-3333.

Testimonials

What Our Clients Say

Read all our reviews on Google
5.0 · 400+

Testimonial 1 of 6

“I don’t even know where to begin, or what to say. Jack and his team went above and beyond anything I could’ve ever expected. My family and I went through a truly horrid experience dealing with the tragic and sudden loss of my kids mother. The last thing we wanted to do was deal with the issues that followed, and I am not a fan of dealing with attorneys, or any of that type of thing. I reached out to Jack’s firm after a recommendation from a friend. Jack called me himself, and assured me he would guide me, and handle everything personally, every step of the way. He made himself available to me via his cell phone at any time day or night. He met me on my level, and made me feel comfortable talking to him, and listening to him. This was way more then just about the settlement, it was about the loyalty, his willingness to go the extra mile, keeping me calm when I didn’t want to be, being fully transparent, and making good on every aspect of his word he gave me and my family when this started. Yes he was able to win my kids a nice settlement, beyond anything we thought possible, but what mattered to us was Jack the man, and THAT is the reason I would never go to anyone else. 5 stars doesn’t do justice to what Jack and his team meant to my family.”
Roger Alex July 31st, 2024
“First off let me say that I am very grateful for Vanessa Dan and Jack Bernstein from Jack Bernstein Injury lawyers they were amazing at helping me go through a tough time in my life when I got injured they helped me get a great settlement and helped me receive great care by sending me to awesome profesional teams where I was able to start my recovery to getting back to my normal lifestyle very satisfied with my experience and recommend them to anybody looking for justice in any injuries they have.”
Linda June 26th, 2026
“I highly recommend Jack and his team. They thoroughly take care of you, explain every step of the process, and ensure they fight tooth and nail to get you what you deserve. Dan assisted with the initial intake, Erika kept me updated, and Jack was available any time we had any questions. Thank you all for your diligence on my case!”
Crystal Hollibaugh Las Vegas, NV · May 16th, 2025
“From day one, I trusted Jack and felt safe. Jack Bernstein is caring, understanding and compassionate. He is everything that I was looking for in a lawyer. Jack and my paralegal Zully were fully committed to my case, and Jack’s expertise and negotiation skills led to a fantastic settlement that far exceeded my expectations. They kept me informed every step of the way. This is the law firm you want in your corner! Jack Bernstein is the way to go!!!”
Lesly Flores March 30th, 2025
“Jack and his staff helped me through my recovery. I didn’t have to worry about anything but healing. They kept me updated on my case and fought for me. Jack has my back and he will have yours too.”
Santana Hargrove Las Vegas, NV · July 16th, 2025
“I had a great experience with Jack Bernstein Injury Lawyers, and I’m especially grateful for the exceptional care and support I received from Erika. From the very beginning, Erika made sure I felt heard and supported. She checked in on me regularly throughout the process, keeping me updated and making sure I understood everything every step of the way. No question was too small she answered all of mine with patience and clarity. Her compassion and professionalism truly made a difficult time much easier. Thank you to everyone at the office!”
Alex Hernandez Las Vegas, NV · May 12th, 2025
Free Case Evaluation

We will contact you immediately.

The consultation is free, confidential, and available now. Tell us what happened. We will tell you where you stand.

Call Now 24/7/365(702) 633-3333

Find out what your case is worth

Free, confidential evaluation in as little as 5 minutes. Contact us today to speak to Jack personally.

  • You pay nothing until we win
  • Get an immediate call back. 24/7
  • We do not sell or share your information
Available 24/7. Or call (702) 633-3333

Visit our office

Our Law Firm Location

Open 24 hours, 7 days a week

Jack Bernstein Injury Lawyers is conveniently located in southeast Las Vegas, on the Longford Plaza near the Warm Springs Road and Eastern Avenue corridor. Our office is located just east of the I-215 beltway, on the edge of Henderson, making it easily accessible from across the Las Vegas and Clark County area.

Injured and recovering at home or in the hospital? We will come to you. Call (702) 633-3333

We serve clients across the Las Vegas metropolitan area, including Henderson, Summerlin, North Las Vegas, the Las Vegas Strip, Downtown Las Vegas, Spring Valley, Paradise, and Enterprise, along with Pahrump and Boulder City.